New system
- Protocol design
- Implementation scope
Provably fair and RNG development
Build result-checking tools and randomness integrations for your game.
Game records
Result verification
Review evidenceTools & technologies
- Cryptographic RNG libraries
- SHA-256
- HMAC
- TypeScript
- Seed-commitment verification
- Statistical test suites
What can we build?
Verification tools
Game records
RNG integration
Player check screens
Test suites
Review documentation
What you receive.
Protocol specification
Verification source
Test evidence
Technical handover
How can we help?
Existing game
- Verification integration
- Player-facing tools
Review support
- Technical evidence
- Agreed remediation
A completed round. A replayable check.
Read this example
Check the published inputs for demo round 42.
- Commitment recorded. Before play: store the server-seed commitment. Client seed + nonce are recorded. Seed remains hidden.
- Seed revealed after play. Compare the revealed seed’s hash with the original commitment. Commitment check.
- Recompute the result. Use the disclosed algorithm and round inputs to compare the recorded outcome. Illustrative verification replay.
This animation illustrates verification steps; it does not execute a cryptographic proof or certify randomness.
Scripted illustration using sample information, not a client case study or a live system.
- Founded in
- 2013
- Projects delivered
- 550+
- Client countries
- 43+
- Global offices
- 3
FAQs
Does verification prove every aspect of fairness?
No. Result verification, randomness and game-rule assessment answer different questions.
Is independent certification included?
No. We can prepare technical evidence and support the separate review process.
Can players check their results?
Yes, where the agreed protocol supports it. The tool makes the required records available.
What must players be able to check?
Share your game rules and verification requirements.
